In the course of Software Architechture, we had an evaluation component that required to design and develop a web application. The evaluation strategy followed by our instructor is not something I would have followed,
Total : 84 units (35% of the total units)
Presentation 1 : 24 units
Objective: To introduce the concept of architectural design of software and its practice.
Total : 84 units (35% of the total units)
Presentation 1 : 24 units
- How well you have presented,
- How serious are you,
- Style and look of presentation
- Conference Creation [ With Proper Procedure]
- PC Chair Login Creation [ With Proper Procedure]
- Author and Reviewer Registration [ When and how you are registering]
- Manuscript/Article Submission [Abstract Submission, Full paper Submission, Author(s) Addition, Keywords etc, withdrawal of submitted manuscript]
- Bidding Process
- Assignment of Reviewers
- Review Comments
- Paper Accept/Reject Decision
- E-Mail Notification [Any One]
- Look and Feel of GUI
Objective: To introduce the concept of architectural design of software and its practice.
Scope: The course will introduce basic concepts and themes of software design focusing on architectural design. The students will appreciate attribute driven architectural design by studying cases.
As far as I know there is no intersecction between the objective of the course and the evaluation scheme followed by our respected instructor.
I do not have a better plan in place to replace the current evaluation plan but I can be sure that will devise a better one that has something related to Software Architechture.
Comments
Post a Comment